| Astrology, 254:Pisces, via Taurus. The secret of the original sin of man is hidden in this truth, for a wrongAstrology, 560:of matter and form to evil ends is the sin against the Holy Spirit. It might be said that theAstrology, 673:and rejected." (S.D. Vol. II, 38) "Every sin committed on Earth is felt in Venus. Every change inAutobiography, 31:and the material. To her, it was a greater sin to be dishonest enough to read private papers thanAutobiography, 186:people in their later 'teens that the wages of sin is death. One of the cleanest men I ever knewAutobiography, 232:around the sacrifice of the sacred bull. The sin of the children of Israel in the wilderness whichBethlehem, that i:and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. "Oh, wretched man that IBethlehem, 80:translation down the centuries. The thought of sin is very little dwelt upon by Christ. It wasBethlehem, 107:of test and trial) our equal in all points - of sin, of weakness and of human frailty, and of humanBethlehem, 108:be tempted, and if so, could He have fallen into sin? Did He meet these temptations as theBethlehem, 108:all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin;" (Hebrews, IV, 15.) He came in a human body,Bethlehem, 109:actions leading to them, that the possibility of sin emerges." (Psychology of Religions, by Dr.Bethlehem, 119:and an emotional use of His divine powers. The sin of the mind, which is pride, was called intoBethlehem, 190:unto things material, the tendency of man to sin and to forget God, and the necessity for a changeBethlehem, 190:we have been so preoccupied with the subject of sin that we have forgotten our divinity; and weBethlehem, 190:that it is inclusive enough to be really divine. Sin exists, and there is sacrifice involved in theBethlehem, 192:also wherein much emphasis has been laid upon sin and evil doing. There is no consciousness of sinBethlehem, 192:sin and evil doing. There is no consciousness of sin in the animals, though there may beBethlehem, 193:have to deal. Against this sense of sin, with its concomitants of propitiation, at-one-ment and theBethlehem, 195:blood sacrifice of Christ and upon the idea of sin? It would appear that two causes are responsibleBethlehem, 196:untrue. 2. The growth of the consciousness of sin in the race, due to its increasing sensitivity toBethlehem, 196:seen that one of the factors responsible for the sin-complex of the West has been the developmentBethlehem, 197:a human [197] characteristic to be conscious of sin, and to realize that when a man has offended heBethlehem, 197:two thousand years of Christianity to raise sin to a position of such importance that it occupiedBethlehem, 197:of the race are almost entirely occupied with sin and how to prevent it. One wonders sometimes whatBethlehem, 197:and upon the wickedness of man. The theme of sin runs naturally and normally throughout humanBethlehem, 197:expression of divinity. Our interpretation of sin and its penalty has been at fault, but theBethlehem, 198:character) is guilty from his birth of original sin, in addition to later sins committed in his ownBethlehem, 198:lifetime. A man can do nothing to remove his own sin and guilt; that can only be done by the graceBethlehem, 198:and that God is in no way responsible for human sin." - A Student's Philosophy of Religion, byBethlehem, 198:strong for the new idea which He came to give. Sin and sacrifice ousted and supplanted the love andBethlehem, 198:Christianity has produced such sad, weary, and sin-conscious men. Christ, the sacrifice for sin,Bethlehem, 198:and sin-conscious men. Christ, the sacrifice for sin, and the Cross of Christ as the [199]Bethlehem, 199:Salvation is not primarily connected with sin. Sin is a symptom of a condition, and when a man isBethlehem, 199:Salvation is not primarily connected with sin. Sin is a symptom of a condition, and when a man isBethlehem, 199:men must suffer in this world as the result of sin. In the East, where the doctrines ofBethlehem, 201:of their fellowmen. How then shall we define sin? First let us look at the words which are used inBethlehem, 201:works and commentaries dealing with the theme of sin, transgression, iniquity, evil, separation.Bethlehem, 201:these words mean? The real meaning of the word sin is very obscure. It signifies literally "the oneBethlehem, 201:give heed to themselves.' Augustine identifies sin with the love of self. Dr. Williams has arguedBethlehem, 201:argued that the underlying principle from which sin arises is to be found in 'the self-assertion ofBethlehem, 201:and hate.' And Dr. Kirk declares that 'sin may be said to begin with self-regard.' " - PsychologyBethlehem, 201:bring us directly to the central problem of sin which is (in the last analysis) the problem ofBethlehem, 202:in the orthodox sense of the term. To St. James, sin is acting against knowledge, and he says "ToBethlehem, 202:to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin." (St. James, IV, 17.) There we have a realBethlehem, 202:IV, 17.) There we have a real definition of sin. It is to act against light and knowledge, and withBethlehem, 202:Where there is no such knowledge there can be no sin; therefore animals are regarded as free fromBethlehem, 202:sin; therefore animals are regarded as free from sin, and men acting in equal ignorance shouldBethlehem, 202:and man, then responsibility steadily increases, sin becomes possible, and it is here that theBethlehem, 202:and it is here that the mystery aspect of sin enters in. It consists in the relation between theBethlehem, 202:the wishes of the "hidden man" are violated, the sin occurs. When these two aspects of man areBethlehem, 202:man controls the activities of the carnal man, sin becomes impossible, and man moves on towardsBethlehem, 203:ignorance every time, and thereby learn not to sin; we are penalized when we do not keep the rules,Bethlehem, 203:are good to remember, for they prevent that dire sin, self-satisfaction. The question of evil isBethlehem, 204:a separative attitude has in it the elements of sin and of evil. When we are separative in ourBethlehem, 204:our major problem. Our study in connection with sin and evil will, as Dr. Grensted tells us,Bethlehem, 204:psychologists do not escape from this view of sin when they deal with it as moral disease, forBethlehem, 205:and individual good, which is of the nature of sin. Love is unity, at-one-ment and synthesis.Bethlehem, 205:of life, and not with the life side of form. Sin is therefore a definite infringement of the Law ofBethlehem, 205:to the realization that, in the last analysis, sin signifies wrong relation to other human beings.Bethlehem, 205:to dawn upon the race today that the only real sin is to hurt another human being. Sin is theBethlehem, 205:only real sin is to hurt another human being. Sin is the misuse of our relationships with eachBethlehem, 206:Christ, did this perfectly. In Him was no sin because He had perfectly transcended the ephemeralBethlehem, 207:all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin." (Heb., IV, 15.) He knew no separateness. RichBethlehem, 215:there was the need to ask God's pardon for the sin committed. The two facts which come to the foreBethlehem, 215:not make a man guilty and therefore punishable. Sin and ignorance are frequently synonymous terms,Bethlehem, 215:are frequently synonymous terms, but the sin is recognized as such by those who know and who areBethlehem, 215:ignorant. Where there is ignorance there is no sin. In this word from the Cross Christ tells us twoBethlehem, 215:suffering (that is, through experience) not to sin. We pay the price of our sins and mistakes, andBethlehem, 215:sins. For we suffer and agonize, and learn that sin brings retribution and causes suffering. ButBethlehem, 221:wrong intent, then forgiveness is assured, for sin consists of definite action in the face of theBethlehem, 240:home to a man a conviction of unworthiness and sin: 'I am a man of unclean lips.' ... (3) 'Tarry yeDiscipleship1, 611:prefers, and which intrigues your sense of sin (I say this with a smile, brother, but the dramaticDiscipleship2, 234:and what is not; in so doing they have created sin and [235] greatly complicated human living andDiscipleship2, 340:sense of penalty and related to a conviction of sin (as the Christian theology so dreadfullyDiscipleship2, 696:body is the first; the failure, weakness or sin of the astral body is delusion. In your case, it isDiscipleship2, 732:by your profound and lasting "conviction of sin" (if I may use so old-fashioned a phrase), and byExternalisation, 119:may evoke some day a response to the "sin of experience," as it has been called, and aExternalisation, 246:even when imposing upon him the penalty of his sin. Hate and separation must cease, and they willExternalisation, 266:individual and group freedom which is the worst sin of the evil men who seek at this time toExternalisation, 374:expense of the suffering of others. This is the sin which Germany is today committing, aided byExternalisation, 515:agonize and die; a world in which hunger, sin, sickness, famine, rapine, and murder stalkFire, 395:fact, action within action, duty within duty, sin within sin, individuality within individuality,Fire, 395:within action, duty within duty, sin within sin, individuality within individuality, ascending andFire, 563:animal kingdom is hidden in the mystery of the sin of the mindless, 80 and in that terrible periodFire, 563:out of a good and altruistic deed. 80 The sin of the Mindless. See S. D., II, 195, 201. This sinFire, 563:of the Mindless. See S. D., II, 195, 201. This sin has to do with the period of the Separation ofFire, 673:were the group which had much to do with the "sin of the mindless," and are very closely associatedFire, 673:Secret Doctrine, such as the above mentioned "sin," and also the early "failures" in buildingFire, 673:which face the occultist, including the "sin of the mindless," the failure in Atlantean days, andFire, 738:not slipped down Into the mire of unredeemable sin and bestiality - go to the Devachan. They willFire, 750:of kindness for relatives cannot be free from sin, even if his body be pure. That hard-heartednessFire, 775:of mind. Who perfects the last body? Fish, sin, and soma. Fish, sin and soma collectively composeFire, 775:the last body? Fish, sin, and soma. Fish, sin and soma collectively compose the three symbols ofFire, 775:of Pisces, the fish. Jesus the fisher of men. Sin - The fall of man, involution of Spirit. Soma -Fire, 825:at the dawn of manvantaric opportunity. No real "sin" was committed; it was their privilege toFire, 977:"In the multitude of words there wanteth not sin," (Bible. Prov. 10:19.) because in a tide of wordsFire, 1089:apparent that the question of what constitutes sin and evil is far more intricate than even appearsFire, 1090:our [1090] limited vision, it appears to be "sin" to fall into incarnation, and equally sin orFire, 1090:be "sin" to fall into incarnation, and equally sin or self-will, self-satisfaction, to remain |
